Patočka’s Interpretations of Hegel’s Thesis on the Past Character of Art

[img]PDF - Authorized users only
Language: English
423Kb
Title:Patočka’s Interpretations of Hegel’s Thesis on the Past Character of Art
Creators:
Ševčík, Miloš; milossevcik at yahoo dot com; Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
Journal or Publication Title:
Estetika: The Central European Journal of Aesthetics, 52, 1, pp. 78-114
Uncontrolled Keywords:Patočka J., Hegel G. W. F., art history, art (concept of), aesthetic value, phenomenology

Abstract

In his article ‘Art and Time’ (1966) Patočka argues that Hegel rightly recognized a fundamental difference between classical and contemporary art. In developing Hegel’s insight he offers a conception of two eras of art, the ‘artistic’ era and the era of ‘aesthetic culture’. Patočka supposes that artworks of both the artistic era and the aesthetic era always open up a certain ‘meaning’ that gives human existence its fundamental points of reference. The status of this world, however, radically changed from one era to the next. The art of the artistic era offered objective and binding meaning, whereas aesthetic art offers personal or individual meaning. The current article points to an important discrepancy in Patočka’s treatment of the relation between the two eras, and presents Patočka’s later reading of Hegel’s notion of the past character of art. From the perspective of this interpretation, art reveals temporality as such, that is, as the ontological basis of the revelation of meaning. The article emphasizes that such an interpretation demonstrates the ontological relevance of the artwork in greater detail. Yet Patočka continued to use the concepts of the artistic era and the aesthetic era, without sufficiently clarifying the relationship between the two eras. Finally, the author argues that the discrepancy in the concept can be resolved with the help of Patočka’s later reflections on the ‘problematic nature’ of meaning. The article argues that in classical art such a nature is concealed, whereas in modern art it is revealed again. The article includes an English translation of Patočka´s ‘Art and Time’.

Official URL: http://www.ceeol.com/aspx/issuedetails.aspx?issueid=944732E4-7DE0-411E-951F-F67A9C27F93D&articleid=FE99A418-6793-4852-B487-FF2BFD204B79

Title:Patočka’s Interpretations of Hegel’s Thesis on the Past Character of Art
Creators:
Ševčík, Miloš; milossevcik at yahoo dot com; Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
Uncontrolled Keywords:Patočka J., Hegel G. W. F., art history, art (concept of), aesthetic value, phenomenology
Subjects:B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BH Aesthetics
Divisions:Humanities and Social Sciences > 8. Section of Historical Sciences > Institute of Art History > Estetika (Aesthetics)
Journal or Publication Title:Estetika: The Central European Journal of Aesthetics
Volume:52
Number:1
Page Range:pp. 78-114
ISSN:0014-1291
Publisher:Institute of Art History Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic
Related URLs:
URLURL Type
http://avi.lib.cas.cz/node/31Publisher
ID Code:8420
Item Type:Article
Deposited On:21 May 2015 13:24
Last Modified:21 May 2015 11:24

Citation

Ševčík, Miloš (2015) Patočka’s Interpretations of Hegel’s Thesis on the Past Character of Art. Estetika: The Central European Journal of Aesthetics, 52 (1). pp. 78-114. ISSN 0014-1291

Repository Staff Only: item control page